Chapter XII:

Conclusion

Chapter IV stated five major stumbling blocks had to be overcome in order to demonstrate the “Strong Nuclear Force” and Gravity were the same force.

1. The Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory is a new theory.  All Classical Physics principles such as Newton’s Law of Gravity, Kepler’s Laws of Orbital Motion, and Einstein’s General Relativity Theory must remain unaffected by the Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory when this new theory is applied to any physical conditions that either Newton’s Law, Kepler’s Law, or Einstein’s Relativity Theories currently apply.
   
   Chapter V analyzed Newton’s Law, Kepler’s Law, and Einstein’s Relativity Theories and demonstrated that those theories remain unaffected if the “Strong Nuclear Force” and Gravity are the same force.



2. Classical Physics demonstrates that the Electrostatic Repulsion Force of the protons in the nucleus is on the order of 3×10³⁵ greater than the Gravitational Attraction Force of the nucleons in the nucleus.  Classical Physics demonstrates that it is impossible for the Gravitational Attraction Force to overcome the Electrostatic Repulsion Force.
   

   In Chapter VII, Quantum Mechanics and the Schrodinger Wave Equation for the Nuclear Electric Field potential and the Nuclear Gravitation Field potential were discussed.  The Schrodinger Wave Equation defines the “Total Energy” of the system.

   Total Energy  =  Kinetic Energy  +  Potential Energy

   The Schrodinger Wave Equation for the Nuclear Electric Field is provided below:

   

   
   

   The Schrodinger Wave Equation for the Nuclear Gravitation Field is provided below:

   

   
   Chapter VIII demonstrated how Quantum Mechanics provides the means for Gravity to overcome the Electrostatic Repulsion Force of the protons in the nucleus.  The wavelength of the Nuclear Electric Field established by the protons in the nucleus of the atom has a wavelength on the order of 10 to 100 times larger than the diameter of the nucleus.  Therefore, the much weaker Gravitational Attraction Force can hold the nucleus together because it doesn’t have to compete with the Electrostatic Repulsion Force to hold the positively charged protons together.  The Gravitational Attraction Force, also known as the Nuclear Gravitation Field is, actually, a very intense field in the vicinity of the nuclear surface.



3. Newton’s Law of Gravity states the Gravitational Field intensity at any given point outside a sphere or point source of mass is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the center of gravity of that mass to that given point (Gravitational Field is proportional to 1/r²).  The field intensity established by the “Strong Nuclear Force” propagating outward from the nucleus “drops off” much faster than a 1/r² function.  The “Strong Nuclear Force” field intensity at any given point appears to be inversely proportional to at least the seventh power of the distance from the center of the nucleus (the “Strong Nuclear Force” is proportional to 1/r⁷), which is inconsistent with Newton’s Law of Gravity.
   
   The field intensity of the Nuclear Gravitation Field propagating from nucleus of the atom should be proportional to 1/r² where “r” represents the distance from the nucleus if it obeys Newtons Law of Gravity.  However, if the Nuclear Gravitation Field has sufficient intensity for General Relativistic effects to be significant, then the Nuclear Gravitation Field intensity will drop off faster than predicted by Newton’s Law of Gravity.  Chapter VIII demonstrated, using “superposition,” how the “Strong Nuclear Force” will seem to drop rapidly to zero as the distance from the nucleus rises because the much stronger Nuclear Electric Field becomes the dominant force.  Using the principles of Quantum Mechanics, Chapter X demonstrated the Nuclear Gravitation Field of the nucleus is on the order of several times that of the Sun at the Sun’s surface.  Since General Relativistic effects of “Space-Time Compression” are significant at the Sun’s surface, General Relativistic effects of “Space-Time Compression” are present at the vicinity of the nucleus.  Both Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity provide the explanation for the Nuclear Gravitation Field intensity dropping off faster as a function of distance than predicted by Newton’s Law of Gravity.



4. Newton’s Law of Gravity predicts the Nuclear Gravitation Field holding the nucleus together is extremely feeble if it is assumed to be a continuous function as is the case with the gravitational field of the Earth.
   
   If the “Strong Nuclear Force” and Gravity are the same force, then Gravity cannot be a continuous function.  Protons and Neutrons in the nucleus have specific energy levels in like manner to the electrons in orbit around the nucleus.  Chapter X demonstrated that if the Nuclear Gravitation Field is quantized, it will be a very intense field and “Space-Time Compression” will occur at the vicinity of the nucleus.



5. The current paradigm of Physics states there are two separate and distinct nuclear forces:
   
   
   1. The “Strong Nuclear Force” is the force that holds the protons and neutrons in the nucleus together.  This force is a very strong, short ranged force that overcomes the “Electrostatic Repulsion Force” of the positive charged protons tending to break the nucleus apart.
   
   
   
   2. The “Weak Nuclear Force” is the “Force of Gravity.”
   
   
   

As discussed in Chapter VIII, the “Strong Nuclear Force” field propagating from either a proton, a neutron, or a nucleus made up of several protons and neutrons propagates omni-directionally.  Unless a medium is present to attenuate the field, geometry dictates that the intensity of the “Strong Nuclear Force” must drop off proportional to a 1/r² function, which is consistent with Newton’s Law of Gravity.  In the absence of any attenuating medium, the only other means for the field to appear to drop off any faster is “Space-Time Compression,” which, is only associated with an intense gravitational field.  In Chapter X, the application of Quantum Mechanics demonstrates that the gravitational field in the vicinity of the nucleus of the atom is an intense gravitational field and significant effects of “Space-Time Compression” are present.

Chapter XI provided physical evidence that the “Strong Nuclear Force” and Gravity are the same force.  Element 83, Bismuth, has unusual gravitational characteristics that can be explained by the Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory.  A weaker Nuclear Gravitation Field reducing the General Relativistic effects of “Space-Time Compression” results in a Nuclear Gravitation Field outside the atomic radius that is more intense than other stable atoms.  The nuclear characteristics of Bismuth also demonstrate that the “Universal Gravitation Constant, G,” is, in fact, not universal at all, but is unique to every isotope of every atom.

Chapter VII introduced Quantum Mechanics and the concept of “magic numbers.”  If the “Strong Nuclear Force” and Gravity are the same force, it is expected that the “magic numbers” for protons and neutrons in the nucleus be the same as the “magic numbers” for the electrons.  The potential function for the Nuclear Electric Field and the Nuclear Gravitation Field are both proportional to 1/r², where “r” is the distance from the nucleus.  The electron magic numbers are 2, 10, 18, 36, 54, 86, and 118, which define the Noble Gases - Helium, Neon, Argon, Krypton, Xenon, Radon, and UUO (Element 118).  After Helium, the proton and neutron “magic numbers” deviate from the electron “magic numbers.”  The proton “magic numbers” are 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, and 114 for Helium, Oxygen, Calcium, Nickel, Tin, Lead and UUQ (Element 114).  The neutron “magic numbers” are 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126, and 184.  The deviations can be justified by the following:

1. Since it was demonstrated in Chapter X that quantized Gravity in the vicinity of the nucleus is more intense than the Sun, both the time dependent term (Total Energy) and the spatial dependent term (Kinetic Energy) in the Schrodinger Wave Equation will be affected by the General Relativistic effect of “Space-Time Compression.”  It should be noted that deviations occur in the second, third and fourth energy levels for protons.  The number of protons that make up the interval between a full fifth energy level and a full sixth energy level (from Tin at 50 to Lead at 82) and make up the interval between a full sixth energy level and a full seventh energy level (from Lead at 82 to UUQ at 114), 32 each, are identical to the number of electrons that make up the interval between a full fifth energy level and a full sixth energy level (from Xenon at 54 to Radon at 86) and make up the interval between a full sixth energy level and a full seventh energy level (from Radon at 86 to UUO at 118).  This pattern indicates there is a similarity between the proton “magic numbers” and the electron “magic numbers” for the higher order energy levels.



2. Both protons and neutrons reside in the nucleus and protons and neutrons are two different types of nucleons.  Only electrons orbit the nucleus.  The Schrodinger Wave Equation for the Nuclear Electric Field only deals with the electron interaction with the Nuclear Electric Field.  The Nuclear Electric Field is result of the protons residing in the nucleus.  The Schrodinger Wave Equation for the Nuclear Gravitation Field deals with either a proton or a neutron interacting with the nucleus.  The Nuclear Gravitation Field is established as a result of both the protons and neutrons residing in the nucleus.



3. Protons and electrons both are affected and interact with the Nuclear Electric Field because protons are positive charged and electrons are negative charged.  Neutrons have no charge so they are not affected by the Nuclear Electric Field.



4. When evaluating the electron interaction with the Nuclear Electric Field, the nucleus appears as a point source of that field.  When evaluating the proton or neutron interaction with the Nuclear Gravitation Field, the protons and neutrons are within the nucleus, therefore, the nucleus is no longer a point source of that field.

I have demonstrated qualitatively and quantitatively that the “Strong Nuclear Force” and Gravity can be the same force without violating any current laws of physics where they apply.  I have overcome the “stumbling blocks” to demonstrating the “Strong Nuclear Force” and Gravity are the same force.  I have provided physical evidence demonstrating the “Strong Nuclear Force” and Gravity are the same force.  Therefore, I conclude that the “Strong Nuclear Force” and Gravity are one and the same force and, by definition, the “Strong Nuclear Force” and “Weak Nuclear Force” are the same force.  Therefore, there is only one “Nuclear Force.”

Index and Direct Links to Other Chapters of Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory
and Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory Home Page/Table of Contents:

Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory

1. Purpose for Evaluation of the “Strong Nuclear Force” and Gravity



2. Executive Summary



3. The Classical Physics Evaluation of Electrostatics and Gravity
1. The Electrostatic Repulsion Force
2. Newton’s Law of Gravity - The Attractive Force of Masses
3. Comparison of Electrostatic Repulsion and Gravitational Attraction



4. Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory:  Major Stumbling Blocks to Overcome



5. New Theory Results Must Equal Old Theory Results When and Where Applicable
1. Newton’s Law of Gravity as It Applies to Large Masses and Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory
2. Kepler’s Laws, Gravity, and Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory



6. Structure of the Nucleus of the Atom



7. The Schrodinger Wave Equation and Quantum Mechanics - The Particle and Wave Characteristics of Matter



8. Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory Versus Accepted Strong Nuclear Force Overcoming Electrostatic Repulsion



9. Comparison of the Nuclear Gravitation Field to the Gravitational Field of the Sun and the Gravitational Field of a Neutron Star



10. Quantum Mechanics, General Relativity, and the Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory



11. Properties of the Strong Nuclear Force, Nuclear Properties of Bismuth, and the Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory



12. Conclusion



13. Appendix A:  References



14. Appendix B:  Background of the Author

Index and Direct Hyperlinks to the Other Web Pages on this Website:

1. Gravity Warp Drive Home Page



2. Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory  (Specific Chapter Links are Provided on this Web Page)



3. Purchase e-Books



4. History of My Research and Development of the Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory



5. “The Zeta Reticuli Incident” by Terence Dickinson



6. Supporting Information for the Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory



7. Government Scientist Goes Public



8. “Sport Model” Flying Disc Operational Specifications



9. Design and Operation of the “Sport Model” Flying Disc Anti-Matter Reactor



10. Element 115



11. Bob Lazar’s Gravity Generator



12. United States Patent Number 3,626,605:  “Method and Apparatus for Generating a Secondary Gravitational Force Field”



13. United States Patent Number 3,626,606:  “Method and Apparatus for Generating a Dynamic Force Field”



14. V. V. Roschin and S. M. Godin:  “Verification of the Searl Effect”



15. The Physics of Star Trek and Subspace Communication:  Science Fiction or Science Fact?



16. Constellation:  Reticulum



17. Reticulan Extraterrestrial Biological Entity



18. Zeta 2 Reticuli:  Home System of the Greys?



19. UFO Encounter and Time Backs Up



20. UFO Testimonies by Astronauts and Cosmonauts and UFO Comments by Presidents and Top U.S. Government Officials



21. Pushing the Limits of the Periodic Table



22. General Relativity



23. Rethinking Relativity



24. The Speed of Gravity - What the Experiments Say



25. Negative Gravity



26. The Bermuda Triangle:  Space-Time Warps



27. The Wright Brothers



28. Website Endorsements and Favorite Quotes



29. Sponsors of This Website



30. Romans Road to Eternal Life In Jesus Christ

© Copyright Kenneth F. Wright, April 10, 2000.
All rights reserved.  No portion of this document may be
reproduced in any form without written permission of the author.